Agent Audit

A deeper review for agents and workflows with structural problems

Use Agent Audit when the issue is not one blocked task but a broader pattern of unreliability, weak handoffs, fuzzy roles, or a bad operating model.

Signals this is the right intervention

  • • The same classes of failure keep returning.
  • • No one fully trusts the agent, but no one can cleanly say why.
  • • Prompts, tooling, permissions, and workflow design are tangled together.
  • • You need a more serious review than quick triage can provide.

What happens

  1. 1. I review the agent role, workflow, tooling, prompts, handoffs, and surrounding operating assumptions.
  2. 2. I identify where the system is making the agent worse than it needs to be.
  3. 3. I recommend structural changes likely to improve reliability, trust, and usefulness.

What you get

  • • A deeper diagnostic read on the operating model
  • • Priority recommendations by leverage
  • • A clearer sense of what should change first and what can wait

Choose this when

  • • Choose this when the problem is systemic, not episodic.
  • • Choose this when there are multiple moving parts and you need a serious review rather than a quick intervention.

What success looks like

  • You can explain the failure modes cleanly instead of vaguely.
  • You have an ordered plan for improving the system around the agent, not just the surface behavior.

Audit work is custom because structural problems vary wildly; pretending otherwise would be theatre.

Next move

If this is the right fit, act on it directly.

Clarity is useful. Follow-through is better. If the fit is obvious, start. If it is not, use the intake and explain the situation plainly.